Which Is More Damaging To Newbies At The Script??

tatehill2000 · Feb 9, 2005

Guys,,, Pleae take a second and VOTE,, there are some that think me Posting my record 61-9 is unfair and Inapropriate, so I am opening it up to the NBA Board,

I am Documented, and the record is 100% accurate,,, the Debate is whether GUAENTEED WINNER, LEAD PIPE LOCKS, GAME OF THE YEAR, is more Damaging to NEWBIES than me Posting a DOCUMENTED, TRUE ACCURATE RECORD,,

according ot the VOTES will Determine if I Change my Posting TITLE
thanks for all who Vote
Tater

bucsfan67 · Feb 9, 2005

Tater, the title was already changed back......

It was done yesterday....

You can post whatever title you like from now on..

Please do not cluster up the sports forums with a "moot" argument.

Thank you

tatehill2000 · Feb 9, 2005

Bucs,,,

ok no worries,,, I reposted it in the Main while you were MOVING it here,, I didint think it would cause a prob,,,, I was not trying to go Behind your back

My apologies for the way it looks,,,

I wanted to try and Look out for the FORUM,,, Please See that in the way I worded the Question,,,

do you follow???

I dont BASH anyone,,, I WANT everyone that comes here to beware of SCAMMERS,,,

thats the purpose of the new thread,,,

No worries,,,
all the best
tater

Polaris · Feb 9, 2005

Tatehill,

Theoretical 61 9
1st Fade 39 32 3
2nd Fade 22 9 1
Actual 61 41 4

I think you have a fabulous system, it is the accounting I cannot understand. And I suspect that is what is generating the little contraversy.

The way I understand it is:

You bet $1 on the 1st fade, and $2 on the 2nd fade.

So the results for the 1st fade is $39 - $32 = $7, you're up $7 units.

When the first bet is lost, you double up on the next game involving the same team to quit, in this sample it was 32 double up bets (one of which was a push).

The results for the 2nd fade is $2x22 - $2x9 = $44 - $18 = $26, you're up $26 units.

Together, $7 + $26 = $33, you're up a total of $33 units.

Seems to me the that you being up $33 units is the actual and theoretical. And that is a big achivement, KUDOS to you! Hats off!